Bad Faith Insurance Lawyer: When and How to Fight Back Against Unfair Claim Denials

Understanding Bad Faith Insurance Practices

Insurance is fundamentally a promise—a contractual obligation that in exchange for your premium payments, the insurance company will provide coverage when you need it most. Unfortunately, some insurers engage in practices that violate this promise, prioritizing profit over their legal and ethical responsibilities to policyholders.

Bad faith insurance refers to situations where an insurance company unreasonably denies, delays, or underpays valid claims. These practices often leave policyholders financially vulnerable at critical moments when they most need the coverage they’ve paid for.

According to a study by the American Association for Justice, insurance companies systematically deny claims to boost their bottom line, a practice that affects millions of Americans annually. This reality stands in stark contrast to the image of protection and security that insurance companies market to consumers.

The Insurance Company’s Legal Duty

Insurance companies have a legal duty of good faith and fair dealing toward their policyholders. This duty is not just a moral obligation but is enshrined in law across all 50 states, though specific requirements vary by jurisdiction. This legal principle requires insurers to:

• Thoroughly investigate claims
• Process claims promptly
• Provide reasonable explanations for claim decisions
• Negotiate settlements fairly
• Prioritize the policyholder’s interests in claim decisions

When these duties are breached, the insurer may be acting in bad faith, opening the door to potential legal action beyond the original claim dispute.

Common Signs of Bad Faith Insurance Tactics

Recognizing bad faith practices early can be crucial to protecting your rights. Here are common red flags that might indicate your insurance company is acting in bad faith:

Unreasonable Claim Denials

Insurance companies sometimes deny perfectly valid claims without proper justification. Watch for:

• Denial letters that cite policy exclusions not applicable to your situation
• Claims rejected based on misinterpreted facts
• Denials issued without proper investigation
• Changing reasons for denial with each communication

Unjustified Delays in Processing

Time is often critical when filing insurance claims, especially for medical treatments or property repairs. Delay tactics include:

• Repeatedly requesting documentation already provided
• Failing to respond to communications within reasonable timeframes
• Transferring your claim between multiple adjusters
• Extended “investigation” periods without updates

Lowball Settlement Offers

When insurers offer settlements significantly below what’s reasonable given the circumstances:

• Initial offers far below actual damages
• Refusal to consider expert opinions on value
• “Take it or leave it” approaches to negotiation
• Ignoring documented costs and expenses

Misrepresentation of Policy Terms

Some insurers attempt to escape their obligations by misrepresenting what your policy covers:

• Citing exclusions that don’t exist in your policy
• Interpreting ambiguous language to favor denial
• Failing to disclose relevant coverage provisions
• “Post-claim underwriting” where they question application information only after a claim is filed

Failure to Investigate Properly

A thorough investigation is essential to fair claim assessment:

• Making claim decisions without site visits when appropriate
• Ignoring expert opinions or relevant evidence
• Selective investigation that focuses only on denial justifications
• Hiring biased experts with histories of insurance-favorable findings

Legal Framework: Insurance Bad Faith Laws

Understanding the legal framework surrounding insurance bad faith claims is essential when considering legal action against an insurer.

First-Party vs. Third-Party Bad Faith

• First-party bad faith occurs when an insurance company improperly handles a claim filed by its own policyholder. This might include unreasonable claim denials, delays, or underpayments on health, home, auto, or disability insurance policies.
• Third-party bad faith involves claims against a liability insurance company for failing to properly handle claims made against its insured by a third party. For example, when an auto insurer refuses to settle a claim against their policyholder within policy limits, potentially exposing them to excess judgments.

State vs. Federal Regulations

Insurance law is primarily governed at the state level, creating significant variations in bad faith protections nationwide:

• Strong protection states like California, Florida, and Washington have robust statutory and case law defining bad faith and providing significant remedies.
• Limited protection states may restrict bad faith claims or cap damages significantly.
• Federal regulation primarily affects ERISA-governed health and disability plans, which often have more limited remedies than state-based claims.

According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, state insurance commissioners received over 200,000 complaints about claim handling in the last reported year, highlighting the scale of this issue.

Available Remedies for Bad Faith

When insurers act in bad faith, potential remedies may include:

• Contract damages to provide the original claim amount that should have been paid
• Consequential damages for financial harm caused by the improper claim handling
• Emotional distress damages in many jurisdictions
• Punitive damages in cases of particularly egregious behavior
• Attorney’s fees and costs in states that provide for fee-shifting in bad faith cases

The Uniform Commercial Code and restatements of contract law recognize the special relationship between insurers and policyholders that justifies these enhanced remedies beyond typical contract disputes.

When to Consider Hiring a Bad Faith Insurance Lawyer

Not every claim denial justifies a bad faith lawsuit. Here are situations where consulting a specialized attorney becomes particularly important:

Clear Policy Coverage Being Denied

If your claim clearly falls within your policy’s coverage yet is still denied, this represents a potential bad faith situation. An attorney can help assess whether the denial contradicts policy language or established interpretation.

Significant Damages at Stake

The economics of insurance litigation mean that cases typically need substantial damages to justify the time and expense involved. Claims involving:

• Catastrophic injuries
• Substantial property damage
• Long-term disability benefits
• Life insurance proceeds
• Business interruption with major losses

These situations often warrant legal expertise to ensure fair treatment.

Pattern of Delay or Obstruction

When your claim faces a pattern of obstruction rather than isolated issues, legal intervention may be necessary:

• Multiple unexplained delays
• Circular documentation requests
• Adjusters who won’t return calls
• Changing positions on coverage

After Exhausting Internal Appeals

Most insurance companies have internal appeal processes. While these can resolve legitimate misunderstandings, they sometimes serve as additional delay tactics. Consider legal help when:

• You’ve completed all internal appeals
• The company maintains denial despite clear evidence
• New justifications emerge with each review level
• Appeal decisions come without explanation

Statute of Limitations Concerns

Bad faith claims have strict filing deadlines that vary by state. According to the American Bar Association, waiting too long can permanently forfeit valid claims. Consider consulting an attorney well before these deadlines approach.

The Process of Fighting Back Against Unfair Claim Denials

Taking action against insurance bad faith follows a relatively structured process. Understanding these steps can help set appropriate expectations.

Documentation and Evidence Gathering

Before proceeding with any legal action, comprehensive documentation becomes your most powerful tool:

• Policy documents including declarations pages and endorsements
• All correspondence with the insurance company
• Claim documentation such as photographs, estimates, and reports
• Timeline of events noting all contacts with the insurer
• Financial records showing damages and out-of-pocket expenses
• Medical records if applicable to your claim

Advanced preparation tip: Use certified mail for important communications and keep phone logs with detailed notes about conversations with adjusters or company representatives.

Initial Consultation with a Specialized Attorney

Most bad faith attorneys offer free or low-cost initial consultations to evaluate potential cases. During this meeting:

• The attorney will review your documentation
• They’ll assess the strength of potential bad faith claims
• You’ll discuss fee arrangements (typically contingency fees)
• You’ll receive guidance on immediate next steps

Formal Demand and Negotiations

Before filing a lawsuit, your attorney will typically send a comprehensive demand letter that:

• Outlines the factual basis for your claim
• Cites relevant policy provisions and laws
• Details the bad faith actions by the insurer
• Makes a specific demand for compensation
• Sets a deadline for response

Many cases resolve during this phase as insurance companies reassess their exposure once legal representation becomes involved.

Filing a Bad Faith Lawsuit

If negotiations fail to produce fair results, your attorney may recommend filing a lawsuit:

1. Complaint filing formally initiates legal action
2. Discovery process involves exchanging information and evidence
3. Depositions where witnesses answer questions under oath
4. Expert witnesses may be engaged to support your claims
5. Motion practice may address legal issues before trial
6. Settlement conferences provide opportunities to resolve the case
7. Trial if necessary, though most cases settle before this stage

According to the Insurance Information Institute, nationwide data shows that less than 5% of insurance bad faith cases actually proceed through a complete trial.

Potential Outcomes

Bad faith cases can resolve in several ways:

• Settlement: Most common outcome, often with confidentiality agreements
• Judgment after trial: Either party may appeal unfavorable verdicts
• Regulatory intervention: Some cases trigger insurance commissioner investigations
• Class action inclusion: Cases with systematic issues may join larger actions

Notable Bad Faith Insurance Case Studies

Examining real-world cases provides valuable insights into how bad faith litigation works in practice.

Case Study 1: State Farm v. Campbell (2003)

This landmark U.S. Supreme Court case established important precedents for punitive damages in bad faith cases.

Background: After causing a car accident, Campbell’s insurer (State Farm) refused a settlement within his $50,000 policy limits, resulting in a $185,000 judgment against him personally.

Bad Faith Actions:

• Refused reasonable settlement within policy limits
• Assured Campbell he had no personal exposure
• Refused to pay excess judgment
• Followed documented company policy to fight claims regardless of merit

Outcome: The Supreme Court upheld punitive damages against State Farm but limited their amount. This case established that insurers have a duty to protect policyholders from excess judgments when settlements within policy limits are possible.

Case Study 2: Hangarter v. Provident Life & Accident (2004)

This disability insurance case revealed systematic denial practices.

Background: Dr. Hangarter, a chiropractor, became disabled and filed a claim with Provident. Despite medical evidence supporting her inability to perform her occupation, Provident terminated benefits after 24 months.

Bad Faith Actions:

• Changed the definition of “occupation” to deny benefits
• Used biased medical examiners
• Implemented company-wide policies to terminate legitimate claims
• Failed to consider treating physician opinions

Outcome: The court awarded over $7.8 million including punitive damages after evidence showed a company-wide policy to deny valid claims. The case revealed internal documents directing adjusters to find ways to terminate expensive claims.

Case Study 3: Aetna v. Davila (2004)

This case demonstrated the limitations ERISA places on health insurance bad faith claims.

Background: Davila was prescribed medication by his doctor, but Aetna denied coverage. Following Aetna’s directive, he took a different medication that caused severe complications requiring hospitalization.

Bad Faith Actions:

• Overruled treating physician recommendations
• Failed to properly review medical necessity
• Prioritized cost savings over patient care
• Inadequate appeal process

Outcome: The Supreme Court ruled that ERISA preempted state bad faith claims, highlighting the challenges in holding health insurers accountable under employer-provided plans.

Case Study 4: Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy Claims

Natural disasters often reveal systematic bad faith practices across multiple insurers:

Background: After these devastating hurricanes, thousands of homeowners and businesses faced claim denials based on flood exclusions, even when wind damage was clearly documented.

Bad Faith Actions:

• Manipulating engineering reports
• Attributing wind damage to flood water (excluded from coverage)
• Systemic undervaluation of damages
• Unreasonable delays leaving properties uninhabitable

Outcome: Multiple class actions and individual lawsuits resulted in billions in additional payments and regulatory reforms. According to FEMA analysis, subsequent audits found that over 40% of initially denied claims contained errors or improper denials.

Selecting the Right Bad Faith Insurance Attorney

Finding the right legal representation dramatically affects your chances of success in bad faith cases.

Specialized Experience Matters

Insurance bad faith is a highly specialized field requiring deep knowledge of:

• State-specific insurance regulations
• Complex case law precedents
• Technical policy interpretation
• Insurance industry practices

Look for attorneys who:

• Focus their practice specifically on insurance law
• Have experience with your specific type of insurance (health, property, disability, etc.)
• Have successfully handled cases against your specific insurance company

Evaluation Criteria for Selecting Representation

Consider these factors when interviewing potential attorneys:

• Track record: Ask about similar cases they’ve handled and outcomes
• Resources: Bad faith cases require significant financial resources to pursue properly
• Communication style: Choose someone who explains complex concepts clearly
• Fee structure: Understand contingency arrangements, including percentages and expense handling
• Professional reputation: Check state bar association records and peer reviews

Questions to Ask Potential Attorneys

During consultations, consider asking:

1. “How many bad faith cases have you handled in the past five years?”
2. “What percentage of your practice is dedicated to insurance issues?”
3. “Have you handled cases against my insurance company before?”
4. “What is your assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of my case?”
5. “What is your approach to settlement negotiations versus trial preparation?”
6. “What specific expertise do you have with my type of claim?”

According to the Legal Information Institute, specialized experience correlates strongly with successful outcomes in complex insurance litigation.

Preventing Bad Faith Scenarios: Proactive Measures

While you can’t completely prevent bad faith practices, you can take steps to protect yourself and strengthen your position.

Before Purchasing Insurance

Research is your best defense against problematic insurers:

• Check complaint ratios through your state insurance commissioner
• Review consumer ratings on claim handling specifically
• Understand coverage details before purchasing policies
• Compare policy language not just prices between companies
• Consider company financial strength ratings from independent agencies

When Filing Claims

Proper claim handling on your end creates a stronger position:

• Report claims promptly following procedures outlined in your policy
• Document everything with photos, videos, and detailed notes
• Communicate in writing whenever possible
• Keep logs of all conversations including dates, times, and names
• Request specific timeframes for next steps
• Follow up regularly on claim progress

During Claim Disputes

If disagreements arise:

• Request specific policy language justifying denials
• Ask for supervisor reviews when adjusters seem unreasonable
• Submit additional documentation addressing specific denial reasons
• Use your state insurance commissioner’s complaint process
• Consider mediation before litigation when appropriate

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to file a bad faith lawsuit?

Statutes of limitations vary by state and claim type, typically ranging from 1-6 years. Some key considerations:

• The clock often starts when the bad faith act occurs, not when the claim was filed
• Some states have different deadlines for contract claims versus bad faith tort claims
• ERISA claims have particularly short deadlines, often just 3 years

Consult with an attorney promptly to ensure you don’t lose your rights through timing issues.

What damages can I recover in a bad faith case?

Potential recoveries typically include:

• Original policy benefits wrongfully denied
• Consequential damages (financial losses resulting from the denial)
• Emotional distress damages in many jurisdictions
• Attorney’s fees and litigation costs in states that allow fee-shifting
• Punitive damages in cases of egregious conduct

A University of Pennsylvania Law Review study found that punitive damages are awarded in approximately 7% of insurance bad faith cases that reach verdict.

Do I need to hire an attorney for a bad faith claim?

While technically possible to represent yourself, success rates for pro se litigants in complex insurance cases are extremely low. Insurance companies employ specialized defense attorneys and have vast resources. Effective representation typically requires:

• Deep understanding of insurance law
• Litigation experience against insurance defense tactics
• Financial resources to pursue the case properly
• Access to qualified expert witnesses

Will my insurance rates increase if I file a bad faith claim?

This depends on several factors:

• Many states have laws prohibiting rate increases for making good faith claims
• Bad faith litigation is often considered separate from your claims history
• Some insurers may choose not to renew policies after contentious claims

Consider discussing potential implications with your attorney during your initial consultation.

What if my insurance is through my employer?

Employer-provided insurance (particularly health and disability) often falls under ERISA, which:

• Preempts many state bad faith laws
• Typically eliminates punitive and emotional distress damages
• Requires exhaustion of administrative remedies
• Often limits recovery to denied benefits and possibly attorney fees

ERISA plans have additional procedural hurdles and reduced remedies, making expert legal guidance particularly critical.

Conclusion

Insurance bad faith remains a significant problem in the insurance industry, with countless policyholders facing wrongful claim denials annually. Understanding your rights and recognizing the signs of bad faith practices are essential first steps in protecting yourself from unfair treatment.

When facing potential bad faith situations, documentation becomes your most powerful ally. Maintaining detailed records of all interactions, correspondence, and claim-related information creates a foundation for addressing improper claim handling.

While the legal process can be complex and intimidating, specialized attorneys who focus on insurance bad faith can provide the expertise needed to level the playing field against well-resourced insurance companies. The case studies examined demonstrate that successful challenges to bad faith practices are possible when approached properly.

Remember that insurance companies have legal and ethical obligations to handle claims fairly and honestly. When they fail to meet these obligations, legal remedies exist to hold them accountable and secure the coverage you’ve paid for and deserve.

If you’re facing a potential bad faith situation, consider consulting with a specialized attorney to understand your options. With the right approach and representation, you can fight back effectively against unfair claim denials and insurance company misconduct.

---

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws regarding insurance bad faith vary significantly by state and individual circumstances. Always consult with a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.